What should a project sponsor use to develop a minimum viable product when requirements are not well-defined?

Using Agile methodology is particularly effective for developing a minimum viable product (MVP) when project requirements are not clearly defined. Agile emphasizes iterative development, where requirements and solutions evolve through collaboration between self-organizing cross-functional teams. This allows the project sponsor and team to focus on delivering a simple version of the product that meets the core needs of users, while remaining flexible enough to adapt to changes and new requirements as the project progresses.

In the context of creating an MVP, Agile allows for frequent reassessment and adjustment, enabling the team to gather feedback from stakeholders and users early and often, which is crucial when requirements are unclear. The iterative cycles within Agile help to refine the product based on user feedback, ensuring that the most valuable features are prioritized and implemented first.

Other options, such as a detailed project plan, would generally outline extensive specifications and timelines, which may not be feasible when working with vague or evolving requirements. A change request form is typically used to document changes to an already defined project and would not be suitable for initial development when the product's requirements are still being discovered. Lastly, a project closure report is meant for evaluating and reflecting on completed projects, and does not contribute to developing an MVP. Hence, Agile methodology stands out as the most appropriate